lunes, 21 de diciembre de 2015
Anna Ubach
The blog shows the collective work done during the sector of Text of the Systems of Representation subject, carried out in the university La Salle, Barcelona. To be more precise, the blog is the final activity of the continuous sequence of articles about the relationships between the contemporary architectural and the architectural program of modern architecture. This relationship between articles, has been done trough the collective creation of a vocabulary of concepts about the topics and the development of animated applications trough the program Flash.
The main aim of the blot is to summarize the import an ideas that emerge as a result of the debate about the Architecture of today with the one of the begging of the Modern Architecture. As it can be seen below, the written expression is complemented with images and banners multimedia.
Thursday, 15 of September of 2015
EVOLUTION
Architecture has a life, it is born and it grows along with humanity, as it has to evolve to satisfy the new needs and demands of its society.
In my opinion, this change provides an incredible potential of evolution towards to the improvement and the liberation.
The evolution of humanity ending with an architect. It represents the .. evolution along with the adaptation of the society.
EVOLUTION SEEN AS “MODERN SUPERPOSITION”
The text is based on the modern superposition that has taken place during this 20th century’s architecture. There are several opinions and points of views about it, but for Francisco de Garcia it has been a violent intromission to the historical places, as architecture has subjected itself to agents and processes not pertaining to it, causing the loss of all that makes it a discipline beyond the confines of history and presenting it self as the opposite to the existent.
In addition, the Modern Movement refuses the idea of traditional architecture, by denying the chance to continue building the city as an artistic entity , which leads to an architecture without identity and loss of the compositional coherence. Furthermore, it has orchestrated an obstinate rejection of mimicry, fallaciously identifying it with mere imitation and copy, when since classical Greece it has been necessary exigent in the evolving nature of artistic production.As a result of these conflict, Francisco Garcia defends that modernity is possible with the best contribution morphological combination of old and new, preserving their identities without them coming into conflict. The idea is to make improvements without modifying for modifying’s sake becoming the center of attention.
In conclusion, a new architecture movement should be born, based on the reconciliation of the historical architecture and the contemporary movement, without losing the efficient methods, superposition of styles, the cultural component and its evolution.
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario